The topic of sexualization of female characters in comics is a controversial one. There are those who believe that through the portrayal of female characters clad in skimpy or tight costumes, that emphasize physical features such as a large chest and slim waistline, the notion that women’s identity lies strictly within their sexuality is emphasized. Therefore, these women have no true identity of their own and are further oppressed. However, there are others who believe that it is when female characters embrace their sexuality that they are creating their own identity. 

 

Hillary Pennell and Elizabeth Behm-Morawitz conducted a study among women that examined the potential positive and negative effects of the sexualized representation of women in action film. While this study focused on women’s representation in film, these action films are based off of comics that portrayed women in the same manner Pennell and Behm-Morawtiz wished to study. Therefore, their findings are relatable to the world of comics. In their comments, Pennell and Behm-Morawitz state, “Although their sex appeal may be seen as objectification of the female body, it may also be constructed as empowering by showing disdain for traditional feminine modesty” (212). Through disregarding the belief that embracing sex appeal is immoral, a woman can construct her own identity while simultaneously deviating from oppressive gender norms of the past. Paul Dini’s Gotham City Sirens is a prime representation of women who are empowered through the acceptance of their sexuality. The characters of Harley Quinn, Catwoman and Poison Ivy are all depicted in Dini’s work as beautiful women. While these women are always wearing either tight outfits or barely any outfit at all, their sexuality is portrayed as an asset and not a hindrance to their identity and power. This section delves into the identity of each villainess and looks at how her sexual representation aids her in defining who she is. 

​

​